Evaluation of the short- and long-term effectiveness and safety of fully covered self-expandable metal stents for drainage of pancreatic fluid collections: results of a Spanish nationwide registry


Por: Vazquez-Sequeiros, E, Baron, T, Perez-Miranda, M, Sanchez-Yague, A, Gornals, J, Gonzalez-Huix, F, de la Serna, C, Angel Gonzalez Martin, J, Gimeno-Garcia, A, Marra-Lopez, C, Castellot, A, Alberca, F, Fernandez-Urien, I, Ramon Aparicio, J, Luisa Legaz, M, Sendino, O, Loras, C, Carlos Subtil, J, Nerin, J, Perez-Carreras, M, Diaz-Tasende, J, Perez, G, Repiso, A, Vilella, A, Dolz, C, Alvarez, A, Rodriguez, S, Miguel Esteban, J, Juzgado, D, Albillos, A and Spanish Grp FCSEMS Pancreas Collec

Publicada: 1 sep 2016
Resumen:
Background and Aims: Initial reports suggest that fully covered self-expandable metal stents (FCSEMSs) may be better suited for drainage of dense pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs), such as walled-off pancreatic necrosis. The primary aim was to analyze the effectiveness and safety of FCSEMSs for drainage of different types of PFCs in a large cohort. The secondary aim was to investigate which type of FCSEMS is superior. Methods: This was a retrospective, noncomparative review of a nationwide database involving all hospitals in Spain performing EUS-guided PFC drainage. From April 2008 to August 2013, all patients undergoing PFC drainage with an FCSEMS were included in a database. The main outcome measurements were technical success, short-term (2 weeks) and long-term (6 months) effectiveness, adverse events, and need for surgery. Results: The study included 211 patients (pseudocyst/walled-off pancreatic necrosis, 53%/47%). The FCSEMSs used were straight biliary (66%) or lumen-apposing (34%). Technical success was achieved in 97% of patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 93%-99%). Short-term- and long-term clinical success was obtained in 94% (95% CI, 89%-97%) and 85%(95% CI, 79%-89%) of patients, respectively. Adverse events occurred in 21% of patients (95% CI, 16%-27%): infection (11%), bleeding (7%), and stent migration and/or perforation (3%). By multivariate analysis, patient age (> 58 years) and previous failed drainage were the most important factors associated with negative outcome. Conclusions: An FCSEMS is effective and safe for PFC drainage. Older patients with a history of unsuccessful drainage are more likely to fail EUS-guided drainage. The type of FCSEMS does not seem to influence patient outcome.

Filiaciones:
Vazquez-Sequeiros, E:
 Univ Hosp Ramon y Cajal, Inst Ramon y Cajal Invest Sanitaria, Endoscopy Unit, Div Gastroenterol, Madrid, Spain

 Univ Hosp Quiron, Div Gastroenterol, Madrid, Spain

Baron, T:
 Univ N Carolina, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Chapel Hill, NC USA

Perez-Miranda, M:
 Hosp Univ Rio Hortega, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Valladolid, Spain

Sanchez-Yague, A:
 Hosp Costa del Sol, Dept Gastroenterol, Marbella, Spain

 Vithas Xanit Internacl Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Benalmadena, Spain

Gornals, J:
 Hosp Univ Bellvitge Inst Invest Biomed Bellvitge, Digest Dis Dept, Endoscopy Unit, Barcelona, Spain

Gonzalez-Huix, F:
 Clin Girona, Endoscopy Unit, Girona, Spain

de la Serna, C:
 Hosp Univ Rio Hortega, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Valladolid, Spain

Angel Gonzalez Martin, J:
 Univ Hosp Ramon y Cajal, Inst Ramon y Cajal Invest Sanitaria, Endoscopy Unit, Div Gastroenterol, Madrid, Spain

Gimeno-Garcia, A:
 Hosp Univ Canarias, Dept Gastroenterol, San Cristobal De La Lagu, Spain

Marra-Lopez, C:
 Araba Univ Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Vitoria, Spain

Castellot, A:
 Complejo Hosp Univ Insular Materno Infant, Gran Canaria, Spain

Alberca, F:
 Hosp Clin Univ Arrixava, Dept Gastroenterol, Unidad Gest Clin Digest, Murcia, Spain

Fernandez-Urien, I:
 Hosp Navarra, Dept Gastroenterol, Pamplona, Spain

:
 Hosp Gen Univ Alicante, Endoscopy Unit, Alicante, Spain

Luisa Legaz, M:
 Hosp Gen La Mancha Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol, Alcazar De San Juan, Spain

Sendino, O:
 Univ Barcelona, Ctr Invest Biomed Red Enfermedades Hepat & Digest, Inst Digest & Metab Dis, Endoscopy Unit,Gastroenterol Dept,Hosp Clin,IDIBA, Barcelona, Spain

Loras, C:
 Hosp Univ Mutua Terrassa, Serv Aparell Digest Unitat Endoscopia, Dept Gastroenterol, Terrassa, Spain

Carlos Subtil, J:
 Univ Navarra Clin, Dept Gastroenterol, Pamplona, Spain

Nerin, J:
 Hosp Clin Univ Lozano Blesa, Dept Gastroenterol, Zaragoza, Spain

Perez-Carreras, M:
 Hosp Univ 12 Octubre, Dept Gastroenterol, Endoscopy Unit, Serv Med Aparato Digest, Madrid, Spain

Diaz-Tasende, J:
 Hosp Univ 12 Octubre, Dept Gastroenterol, Endoscopy Unit, Serv Med Aparato Digest, Madrid, Spain

Perez, G:
 Hosp Univ Cent Asturias, Dept Gastroenterol, Endoscopy Unit, Oviedo, Spain

Repiso, A:
 Hosp Virgen Salud, Dept Gastroenterol, Endoscopy Unit, Toledo, Spain

Vilella, A:
 Hosp Son Llatzer, Endoscopy Unit, Dept Gastroenterol, Palma de Mallorca, Spain

Dolz, C:
 Hosp Son Llatzer, Endoscopy Unit, Dept Gastroenterol, Palma de Mallorca, Spain

Alvarez, A:
 Complejo Asistencial Univ Salamanca, Dept Gastroenterol, Salamanca, Spain

Rodriguez, S:
 Complejo Asistencial Univ Zamora, Dept Gastroenterol, Zamora, Spain

Miguel Esteban, J:
 Hosp Clin San Carlos, Endoscopy Unit, Madrid, Spain

Juzgado, D:
 Univ Hosp Quiron, Div Gastroenterol, Madrid, Spain

Albillos, A:
 Univ Hosp Ramon y Cajal, Inst Ramon y Cajal Invest Sanitaria, Endoscopy Unit, Div Gastroenterol, Madrid, Spain
ISSN: 00165107





GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY
Editorial
MOSBY-ELSEVIER, 360 PARK AVENUE SOUTH, NEW YORK, NY 10010-1710 USA, Estados Unidos America
Tipo de documento: Article
Volumen: 84 Número: 3
Páginas: 450-450
WOS Id: 000382233600010
ID de PubMed: 26970012

MÉTRICAS