Clinical-Functional Evaluation and Test-Retest Reliability of the G-WALK Sensor in Subjects with Bimalleolar Ankle Fractures 6 Months after Surgery.


Por: Fernández-Gorgojo M, Salas-Gómez D, Sánchez-Juan P, Barbado D, Laguna-Bercero E and Pérez-Núñez MI

Publicada: 15 abr 2022 Ahead of Print: 15 abr 2022
Resumen:
Ankle fractures can cause significant functional impairment in the short and long term. In recent years, gait analysis using inertial sensors has gained special relevance as a reliable measurement system. This study aimed to evaluate the differences in spatiotemporal gait parameters and clinical-functional measurements in patients with bimalleolar ankle fracture and healthy subjects, to study the correlation between the different variables, and to analyze the test-retest reliability of a single inertial sensor in our study population. Twenty-two subjects with bimalleolar ankle fracture six months after surgery and eleven healthy subjects were included in the study. Spatiotemporal parameters were analyzed with the G-WALK sensor. Functional scales and clinical measures were collected beforehand. In the ankle fracture group, the main differences were obtained in bilateral parameters (effect size: 0.61 = d = 0.80). Between-group differences were found in cadence, speed, stride length, and stride time (effect size: 1.61 = d = 1.82). Correlation was moderate (0.436 < r < 0.554) between spatiotemporal parameters and clinical-functional measures, explaining up to 46% of gait performance. Test-retest reliability scores were high to excellent (0.84 = ICC = 0.98), with the worst results in the gait phases. Our study population presents evident clinical-functional impairments 6 months after surgery. The G-WALK can be considered a reliable tool for clinical use in this population.

Filiaciones:
Fernández-Gorgojo M:
 Escuelas Universitarias Gimbernat (EUG), Physiotherapy School Cantabria, Movement Analysis Laboratory, University of Cantabria, 39005 Torrelavega, Spain

 International Doctoral School, Rey Juan Carlos University (URJC), 28032 Madrid, Spain

Salas-Gómez D:
 Escuelas Universitarias Gimbernat (EUG), Physiotherapy School Cantabria, Movement Analysis Laboratory, University of Cantabria, 39005 Torrelavega, Spain

Sánchez-Juan P:
 Escuelas Universitarias Gimbernat (EUG), Physiotherapy School Cantabria, Movement Analysis Laboratory, University of Cantabria, 39005 Torrelavega, Spain

 Alzheimer's Centre Reina Sofia-CIEN Foundation, 28031 Madrid, Spain

:
 Sports Research Centre, Department of Sport Science, Miguel Hernández University of Elche, 03202 Elche, Spain

 Alicante Institute for Health and Biomedical Research (ISABIAL), 03550 Alicante, Spain

Laguna-Bercero E:
 Escuelas Universitarias Gimbernat (EUG), Physiotherapy School Cantabria, Movement Analysis Laboratory, University of Cantabria, 39005 Torrelavega, Spain

 Traumatology Service and Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospital "Marqués de Valdecilla" (UHMV), 39008 Santander, Spain

Pérez-Núñez MI:
 Escuelas Universitarias Gimbernat (EUG), Physiotherapy School Cantabria, Movement Analysis Laboratory, University of Cantabria, 39005 Torrelavega, Spain

 Traumatology Service and Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospital "Marqués de Valdecilla" (UHMV), 39008 Santander, Spain
ISSN: 14248220
Editorial
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI), ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND, Suiza
Tipo de documento: Article
Volumen: 22 Número: 8
Páginas:
WOS Id: 000785216900001
ID de PubMed: 35459036
imagen Green Published, gold

FULL TEXT

imagen Published Version
No Accesible

MÉTRICAS