Magnesium-based resorbable scaffold vs permanent metallic sirolimus-eluting stent in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: 3-year results of the MAGSTEMI randomised controlled trial.


Por: Ortega-Paz L, Brugaletta S, Gomez-Lara J, Alfonso F, Cequier A, Romaní S, Bordes P, Serra A, Iñiguez A, Salinas P, García Del Blanco B, Goicolea J, Hernández-Antolín R, Cuesta J, Gómez-Hospital JA and Sabaté M

Publicada: 5 ago 2022 Ahead of Print: 5 ago 2022
Resumen:
BACKGROUND: The long-term safety and performance of magnesium-based bioresorbable scaffolds (MgBRS) in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients are uncertain. AIMS: The aim of this study was to report the 3-year clinical outcomes of the MAGSTEMI trial. METHODS: This investigator-driven, multicentre, randomised, single-blind, controlled trial randomised STEMI patients 1:1 to MgBRS or to permanent metallic sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) at 11 academic centres. The main secondary endpoints included device-oriented composite endpoints (DoCE) and patient-oriented composite endpoints (PoCE), their individual components, any bleeding, and device thrombosis rate. All endpoints were defined according to the Academic Research Consortium. Events were adjudicated by an independent committee. RESULTS: Three-year clinical follow-up was obtained in 142 (90.0%) patients. At 3-year follow-up, MgBRS were associated with a higher rate of DoCE than SES (13 [17.6%] vs 5 [6.6%], diff -11.0 [95% CI: -21.3 to -0.7]; p=0.038). This difference was driven by an increased incidence of DoCE within the first year of follow-up. In the landmark analysis, there was no difference between 1 and 3 years (0 [0.0%] vs 1 [1.4%]; p=1.000). The difference in the rate of DoCE was driven by a higher incidence of target lesion revascularisation (TLR) in the MgBRS group compared to SES (12 [16.2%] vs 4 [5.3%]; diff -10.9% [95% CI: -20.7 to -1.2]; p=0.030). The difference in TLR was observed during the first year, with no further differences observed between 1 and 3 years (0 [0.0%] vs 1 [1.4%]; p=1.000). CONCLUSIONS: At 3-year follow-up, MgBRS were associated with a higher rate of TLR, which was clustered within the first year, compared to SES.

Filiaciones:
Ortega-Paz L:
 Interventional Cardiology Department, Cardiovascular Institute, Hospital Clínic, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain

Brugaletta S:
 Interventional Cardiology Department, Cardiovascular Institute, Hospital Clínic, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain

Gomez-Lara J:
 Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, Barcelona, Spain

Alfonso F:
 Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain

Cequier A:
 Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, Barcelona, Spain

Romaní S:
 Hospital San Pedro de Alcántara, Cáceres, Spain

:
 Hospital General de Alicante, Alicante, Spain

Serra A:
 Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain

Iñiguez A:
 Hospital Alvaro Cunqueiro, Vigo, Spain

Salinas P:
 Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain

García Del Blanco B:
 Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain

Goicolea J:
 Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain

Hernández-Antolín R:
 Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain

Cuesta J:
 Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, Barcelona, Spain

Gómez-Hospital JA:
 Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, Barcelona, Spain

Sabaté M:
 Interventional Cardiology Department, Cardiovascular Institute, Hospital Clínic, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain

 Centro de Investigacíon Biomédica en Red. Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV), Madrid, Spain
ISSN: 1774024X





EuroIntervention
Editorial
EUROPA EDITION, France, Francia
Tipo de documento: Article
Volumen: 18 Número: 5
Páginas: 389
WOS Id: 000882974700006
ID de PubMed: 35225793

MÉTRICAS